In which I revisit the initial Oulipost questions, and put them into the
past tense with my own spin.
What was the most exciting part about Oulipost?
It was really fun to play around with different forms and be a little less
structured in the content I produced. While being more structured in specific
things that needed to be done each day. Given that I only moved to Houston in
the last year, obsessively scanning the local paper was a pretty good way to
get a feel for my new home.
Now that I have had time to read other people’s work, I am really impressed
by what other people did with the prompts and the different ways they
responded. Oulipost is completely new to me, and it kind of freed me up. I have
been playing around a bit with applying some of the forms to other texts, and
it’s really cool, what comes out.
What was the LEAST exciting part of
Oulipost?
I am new to this approach, and while I think it was good for me, there were
lots of “Crap! What do I do with THIS?” moments. Scary is different than
exciting, for me.
Even less exciting was the commitment in terms of time. April was a bad
month in terms of free time. I suspect any month would have been just as bad.
The only good month to do something is the month you don’t have to.
What did you learn about writing experimental or found poetry?
I wasn’t aware of how many constraints were possible! It was challenging
many days, but what was surprising was that the constraints produce far more in
the way of creativity than I ever thought. I was really impressed by what other
people could do.
The other thing I learned, more generally, is something I probably should
have always known, but that it’s easy to forget. You get out what you put in.
When I didn’t have much time to work on things, there was never a poem I was
really proud of. Inspiration seems to work best in the context of either a lot
of excess time, or a lot of hard work, or both.
FPR:
What did you learn about source material?
I did best when I could sit in the coffee shop, pen in hand, and mess around
with the actual physical, literal
Houston
Chronicle. I can understand why the morning paper was such a ritual for so
many people for so long, and I do think a lot gets lost in the translation to
digital, at least in terms of the sense experience.
I tried to focus on the local sections of the newspaper, or the sections
with the most regional inflections, like sports. This felt a little more
general. There were some national stories I couldn’t resist, but I was worried
that too many of these would make things generic.
FPR:
Who is your- ?
I’m still going with Burt Reynolds, or perhaps Sterling Archer.